Should voters take Keith Davey seriously?   As of now he is heading~up the, unofficial campaign, to unseat John Turner as leader of the Liberal party.
Davey is a Seinator and he owes that honour to his long service as chief strategist and tactician within the party.    He earned the title Rainmaker for his uncanny ability to read the public mind and advise his leaders accordingly -    T(he Sena tor has served two prime ministers： Lester Pearson and Pierre. Trudeau.    Of the two, his heart belonged to Trudeau, whom he loyally served for all the time Trudeau held the prime ministership.    Even today, Davey will unabashedly declare that Trudeau would make the best leader of the party.    Given the-residue of ill feeling that   i ' sticks to the Trudeau name among Liberals throughout the country one has to admire Davey's sense of devotion.
Yet it is this very devotion whi^rh makes his assessment of the Turner leadership a little suspect.    Is the Rainmaker not trying to trarisf^orm Turner .into ,a. Blametaker?    That is, to saddle-Turner with the poor performance of the Liberals in the recent by-election iri1 Pembina.
The Tories narrowly won the contest, but in Alberta a slim
投票者應不應該支持戴維？以
爲首的一撮自由黨人。現正準備尚 黨領袖杜納挑戰。 一：
戴H^^議A"，長久以來是黨^ 的首席謀士 ft策略1家二他揣測,大
衆的心意，並以|b向黨領袖忠吿 因此獲得一涸别名爲0氣象學家 (RAI NMAKER) ◎
他曾爲兩任總瑪服務一皮雅遜^ 和杜魯多。在兩入中s他最支持杜 '魯多.> 忠心耿耿地務至杜氏任期
满爲止。他現在仍然認爲杜是自由
黨最好的領袖》雖然很多《自由；黨人
對杜魯多不満^但不能否認戴維的
忠誠° -
這種忠誠使他懷疑杜納的領導才
能。我們的戴維,否要把杜納變爲
—fi R受過者"卽垦說》把自
由黨最近在朋比那的補，選失敗歸咎
-於&納一人：^上。" ' 保守黨在這次補選中僅勝'。從
守黨的眼光來看。在阿伯達省僅 無異等如失敗a,們本來預期能
敗自由黨和新民主黨的B不然的
學家"與
THE RAINMAKER AND THg，L—M4&rMK，人
二』：
膨•
懷雅遜學院歷史系講師
CJRT電台公開學院 課程策割人
DESMOND GLYNN ；
,綦廸文
•"•criHiHiiw
victory is too close to a defeat if you are a Tory. - Conseryatiye;s are supposed to wipe the floor; with the Liberals and the New. 「. Democrats in that part of the r, country•    When they don't ； something is seriously wrong^ ： What has the likes of Keith Dayey worried is that it was the Wew; Democrats who made it close, not the Liberals.  .3bhh Turner is the man who is supposed to revive the Liberal? party in the West.    Th，， ^ ,is; cleatly part of; ttis, raandatej'as I leader.    It was for' that sole 7" purpose that Turner, a longtimp Toronto resident, moved to British Columbia to contest a i constituency seat in the last
、-
忽視的昌。 很強的競選人 長•新民主黨 那^衆認潯博 人B'ltk們S新
新民主黨這次有二腥
一""^卩前任艾蒙顿市 不能勝出是因爲^比 |&班是腥妄自,^的: 民*黨W禀镳非H.角
逐者得人望贫而且又在一涸很強的 政治基礎。自由黨的競選人能齊這
'劣嗎？ '；
保
大
,維向杜納挑戰的"蓮動" S想在十一月:昀大會中檢討篱麵
位：i豹盲他人也d ； 還有杜魯多時代謀臣占國士在,次
•大:選中也虎癞眈眈：人m^MMMj
：有杜納在。保守黨將輕易取ii。？ 戴維與其同路人最大的問題是:那
裎±找一涸杜納的代替人◎他，以 wl ：祈理純。但這昌很危險的。；祈 逢純可能和杜納一樣被人過高一計 了 。他在反對黨席上的表現並不：很 搴人@ …. '. -1 釋有一點。如祈理純當選爲,由 領袖,-那一涸黨將會收益？毫無
»一定有些東西不對勁◎ , 戴維和他的同^人所擔心的§在
這次補選中B是新民主黨緊迫保守 黨而非自由黨。杜納本身要在西海
岸重張自由黨旗鼓。這i他在黨內| 的指令。所以他窭在」上次的大選中 從多倫多搬到卑斯省去參加一膪區 的議席，杜納要在杜魯多聲譽下降 的地方重振自由黨的聲威0
當然。朋比郝的補選本能反映杜 納的才能，但他顯然需要說服加拿 大人他就是梅隆尼或博洛班的最佳 -替換人0
我們在這次朋比那的補選中所不
華準人事
十B3分局設東方罪案*組
管轄士巴丹拿逭以西區域的十四 察分局P成立"東方罪案偵緝組 •加強維挎華人社區治安。這是 中區華埠第二間警察分局設此iRP，
9»
•、自.由黨將會在魁北克省^復 已失落了的力量&但能恢復全^力 量嗎？我不以爲然。;祈沒有杜#多
的吸引力。很多魁北克人認爲M在 梳雲力根的曰常工作上過於友纤0
他並沒有杜魯多的優雅和世故。i還 有"我們也不能過早對梅隆尼~t筆
勾銷a他在魁北克還有寳力。、h 但^魁北克以外誰會佔優勝^?
各省對魁北克可能蜀佔兩涸政*領 ^的反應又如何？新民主黨當然會 歡迎這涸。他們也許不會公開^說
出來s但有機會英m加拿大购, 黨一去競選會使他們心,中暗^ ？
杜納當然不是^隆尼的最佳簪换： 者0 ^目前他是自由黨的最佳镇選
人》這是爲甚麼戴維那麼擔心"
COST!移民中心入籍*
COSTI扭民服務敎育中4;擧
之免費入籍班，於本年秋季毒度 班。請於逢星期一或二下午一特 至七時報名◎(書院街七百六+裨
二樓卽C 0 L L E G E與0 5* ― I k.GT'ON交界〗'\   '-"1 ：
general election.    The ；Literal standard was supposed to wave proudly,.wheje it. had 4r;QPpe^ so limply when Pierre Trudeau was standard - beareir 。    ~ ：、
There can be no doubt that the \ Pembina by-election didn1t reflect well on: Turner's leadership. - '、 Clearly, he has yet to persuade Canadians that he is an effective { alternative；to Mulroney, dx for that matter Ed Broadbent-
What should not be over1ooked in. the Pembina contest is that the NDP ran a very strong carididate, the ' former mayor of Edmonton.    The Neil Democrats didn1t make it close because people in Pembina think Ed Broadbent is a swell guy.  .They 春 voted NDP because the local 、 }' candidate was popular and had a strong politicai rbase .tpj york ;f rom.. Can.仁j same \ h3^\ s!k id of / tlje Libef .^1 candidate? ；
? The ；Dayey^ campaign, against ) Turner .'is pXaKiitly. the operiin^ shoti to have the leadership of the party reviewed at the November        一 ， convention.    Already others in the' party feel the same way. Evidently, Jim Couttsr another mastermind from the Trudeau era, is also wringing his hands over the prospect of Turner leading the party in another general election. The feeling is that the Tories will have an easier time of it tjith ： Turfte'r*
v   The main problem with Jt^:、， 、 coiripiTaints. qf Davey cmd those in the ： party wjto ag,r，e 、with hiU^ 、 this:' Where do they find an alternative to Turner？ The k Senator may well reply: Jean Chretien.    That is very risky.； Chretien may well- be —as. overrated a leader as Tuther once ' was.    His performance on.%\m >. opposition benches was not. particularly   impressive^hort / though it was... ！,
Consider this as well- Which party willTbenefit the most if , Chretien becomes leader of the Liberals? r TrUe the Liberals may regain the strength they once had iri Quebec.    But will thqy regain all of it?   I don't think so.' Chretien doe^ rtob have the ^ame appeal to Ouebeckers that Trudeau had.    TKere are riot a feWj  ：-:.' Quebecke^s/who think Chretien plays the friendiy^-frog from Shawinigari routine ；a little too much： He lacks the polish and sophistication of Trudeau.    And besides it would be premature ..to w-tite off. Mulroney;p he rs not "a spent force in Quebec,
yet
'、^
；v \
i And oppg ou^sji^O ?Qufeb(^c )who \ / wo^ld tLuhl'liest? ] wiil.sl£aw( is the rest；of the country to respond to
！ Oudbee Afeadi-n^ up: tlhe-two^ J- 'f  " ， establishment parties?   Surely the NDP would .Iqve 5i,t.    Of. cour seethe , New Democrats would ^riever say it. publicly, but the .chance to rxin as the party of English' Cariada would make their hearts hum.,
。No, John Turner is not the tjest' alternative to Mulroney. "But a.ss matters now stand he is the best alternative the Liberals have. That Vs why the Rainmaker is so worried. 、， 1
張錦輝驕i滿地可市長打氣和
加
夭fete可卞月競鎏！長。華;
輝先生参與角逐a這是,;i|
mnnmm^我w應1該釵掌歡」 迎；加緊w打氣88 、不論成敗如何" ,•祗論,耘。不計攸穫、希望張錦; 輝先生、在参加歳選大^之下。抱; 定^a n不撓不屈-立卽宣佈對満, 地訶的施政綱領。使各國族裔。聞; 風而起&踴躍協助d如獲成功。不1 祗是華人的光彩。抑亦突破百餘年 來法裔政客的包辦勢力•而爲少數 »開創自由獨立的形態。惟茲 .大。不能僥倖而成。事前須 一番準備的佈白。方能獲得順利的 進展^略述兩點如下：
(一》建立新財政系統一一自十 年§ti開始。，卽一^七六年。満地， 埠曾得意洋洋"擧辦世界奥林匹克i
運動大會a由於工程浩大'管理不:
當:。所以比原定預算^出甚巨、，
着體,起見。市府不得不力卩量負 。多方籌措。以資彌補O與此同
會場門券的收入。並*達到預期^ 想a拖欠十餘億美元'因而満地可 政府。非fe'廿餘年，無法淸償a所
21加倉各項稅敉。以資彌補•其中 以房屋地產一、。較諸各市特重.Q棘 令新的市長上任？對^現行稅制。！ 毫無改善^則無異新瓶舊酒»侬樣
a提出新的綱要•爲布今饞施 政計劃a這§最基本的r重點。'若能
有個改f計劃"必能博取各族裔的 祌聖一票®
(二）省市聯繫的重要性——市 府的行政。雖然獨立。但在許多:^
面仍受省府的節制"况且魁北
命脈a集中於満地可。換言之。魁
北克將來的興衰。要以満埠的繁榮 或衰落爲尺度。所以競選市長應當
列出繁榮的施政辦法》 id^f發展中 小商業0以反如何減少失業o血爲 當前最吃香的問題。應該^爲選擧 的大綱.，'
張麴^先生。垦由戾主^盟黨:^
推擧出^的审長候選Ammm m 黨僅在杨臈身前成立；'由露大W 、 希臘及華人等成員.所組織• m^m 有二千成員。雖較其他兩大黨有所
不反。但i若能徹底地爭取希臘反 意大利兩族裔的選票。再加上游移 未定的中立者的選票《集合起來》 亦未知鹿死誰手；突破法人擎斷選 擧局面,呆可料。所JBI我們全體華 人》應,磬援、、務使這次蹿地可巿 長,攀。可以夤立將來華人参政的 里程碑。. ;
十七曰(星期五）上午十畤至十一: 時於該*心韆堂擧辦一臈敎育性講
m °題、目^ e防火須知59由消防督; 察主讜。華語翻,。內容包括如何 防止火災及其重要性。遇到火災畴: 的適當處理方&等、    ' ；
歡迎各誊老屆時蒞臨嘉中心參 加費，全.兔。.詳情請電嘉蘭中心與
漢光雙十訪問團演出成功
99
,台灣《漢光慶祝雙十訪fell 於十月四日訪問多市9在镩骓遜:t 學院劇院公演一場。全場満座^ 衆兩千餘人。'
"漢光訪問圑W由台灣^中國電
！視公:司,,、職藝員組^ "—行廿ffl人