畤《仗且2 8 §年7
A€
t- t r ■ ■ -" " "■■ 1 ■ ■1 " 1 '■'
,國一 ■■■ ■■■" i ii i ir ■
As Chairman. Cycling Commi concerned aboi the growing n, in Toronto, a Larmifig incn involving eye. over the last and we need t< stop this darn
In a .sense, become a vict success. We thousands of the roads s tl
作爲多市城
我,對於曰渐
及其路上安全
去數年內,與
意外數字劇增
適當行動來制 成功推行踏 來弊端o現時 萬的踏單車人
上下班、逛公 市內的草坡j 人士喜愛的j 以上所述的j 是省油和泰 車司機寤靄j 爲他們幫助降、 的情況-可:
. Imagine wW immigrant god A knoclc id night, a knoq signify the in Canadai、: ;1 to your^cHiidl go to school.I explain to yol have to pay hi than through I warries of be during work a The Workman's Board will no payment.. Exp employee but talk to becau you and give identity,. : ThJ loneliness of
Why would endure such— h them came t.6 t^ey^want to
、奉公守Afe 法治社會中希 起碼的代價o J
似寧靜的社會j 勤工作,兢兢j
犯法的事,但j 就以爲是世界j 有可資信任的; 有可能隨時把 有些是與妻兒j 都是生活在恐j 巴巴看着隔壁l| 知道爲什麽自
權利o另外有,
在此間,妻兒j 何年何月才有j
丽SANCTIONS
IS1
RICA: A CLEAR SIGNAL
V
.)1
邦外交部長克拉克》曰前公' 貿易制裁甬非》作爲反種族隔離漆 主義的強硬行動。所有擁護和爭取 自由、平等的人士"都會歡迎政府
此項措施°
南非的種荜隔離政策,是全球的 羞耻。國際間的制裁行動-如非過 份軟弱毫無作用&便是畏首畏尾"
Federal External Affairs Minister Joe Clark recently announeed trade sanctions against South Africa as a firm action to counteract its apartheid policy. Every person who upholds and strives for freedom and equality would welcome this policy of the £ government, i
'The apartheid policy "of South Africa is the shame of the whole world. International sanctions are either overtly weak, rendering them useless, or they
力不足。
卽以加拿大本身爲例-類似的 措施,曾於一九七七年由當時的 執政自由黨頒行。但出口南非的 品總値"卻自七七年的八千三百 元跳升至去年的二億零二百萬完^ 其比率及增長之速》遠勝出口其他 國家°
are not pursued with resolution-Using Canada as an example,-firm action such as trade sanctions was imposed in 1977 by the then governing Liberal Party. The total value of goods exported to South Africa, nevertheless, increased from 83 million dollars in 1977 to 203 million dollars last year. The ratio and rate of increase have been so rapid that they surpass that of the other trade partners of Canada.
In reality, Canadian sanctions
其實加國的制裁行勳s遠溯一九 六一年参與將南非逐出大英聯邦0
無奈嗣後各國末能"窮追猛打、或 於利益關係與南非"藕斷絲連"-遂使其坐大。
這次加拿大政府"重新"採取行 »收效可能依舊輕微。重要的是 她的信息:向南非發出警號-向其
can be dated back to 1961, when Canada participated in banishing South Africa from the British Commonwealth. Unfortunately/ ' perhaps because of financial, interests, participating countries did not follow up the action with vigour. Each country maintained a limited relationship with South Africa^ enabling it to grow stronger.
The renewed sanctioas of the Canadian government may still have negligible effects. What is important, however, is the message behind this action. It
方國家表態o I
近曰南非又因種族歧視問題發生 ^衆多黑人死於警察槍下;,過 去十臈月來-遭受白人政府屠殺的 民衆,達四百多名&
加拿大政府在此時宣佈制裁措施 》可謂適當之至0
gives South Africa, a warning signal and clarifies Canada's attitude to the other western countries•
Recently, ciots have again } erupted over the problem of racial discrimination, resulting in the deaths of many blacks fired by the police. In the past ten months, the deatn toil of citizens massacred /by the white government is more than 400. The jnnouncement of ' saadtion policies by the Canadian- government at this time \s an appropriate action.
B8DID
%
">1
一—
全面津貼天主敎學校是最近安省 最熱門的政治話齄。表面上,天主. 敎會比其他宗敎佔盡優勢-使到很 多安省人感到不平9而且不斷提出 質詢。現時三國政黨都無法提出一 個圓満答案9但三黨都一致認爲這 政策是公平和公正的。但反對者絕 不千休"更無法同意三黨的說法O
爲什麼支持全面天主敎免費敎育會 是公平的^而S持其他的宗敎敎育 卻不? 、-
省長彼德遜將此事件移交高院裁 決$要求高院,核津貼計劃的憲法
問題。省長^擧遭受到各方面的枰
Full funding for Cathui:c . schools is the most controvec-
issue in provincial politics today. All' over Ontario teseatment has come to the boilinq point because of the prospect of the prospect of a fully-fledged, dualistic system of education: one Gdtholic ? the other noa-denominational and secular. On the 、 face of it the Catholics appear to be given a .clear: advaatdiqe over other religious groups and many disgruntled Ontarians are asking why? The three major political parties have not really come up with a satisfying answer. Ail three assert that eqjua丄 funding, is ]ust and fair. But critics of the proposal are not con-virtced。 How can it be fair if one ceiigioiis denomination is funded for educational purposes and all the others' are not?
• Premier Peterson has taken an important step in the direction of educating the opposition to full funding by referring the matter t9 the Supreme Court. He has'asked the cpart to render judgement |on the constitutionality of
CATHOLICS AND THE CONSTIT
。反對者認爲彼德遜早已同意氣 策9只不過希望得到一點法律上 的支持。將自己的責任推卸袷法6院
9從而替他的政府辯
f9
但反過來。在指貴省長卸責的
兒-人們卻忽略了兩個重要問題o
第一,爲什麼在未開庭便肯定了高 院會同意政客的決定;第二 9如果 反對者的預料準確S爲什麼不看看
法院方面有何重要的發現?根據什 麼理由來同意政客這項決定? 高院方面很有可能承認安省旳天
主敎會3在憲法上確有權要求一個
jfull seperate school funding. •The Premier has been attacked for talcing this route. The opponents of equai funding argue that since Mr. Peterson has already indicated his government will proceed with full funding what he hopes to " gain from a legal opinion is to shift the responsibility for the decision to the coui:t» He will then be 丄e to defend his government's action by saying the Supreme Court agrees Catholics are entitled to full funding- " In accusing Mr. Peterson of evading the political responsibility iot U丄ndinq the opposition nas cjiweriii.-.'iciy •overlooked
points. One f wny riosum'c ^t tno outlet that the court necessarriiy' agree w丄tn the politicians? Two, if that assumption, turns out to be . correct why clisn^sf- out oi hand the ^ignii^Cdnce of the court's concurrence with the politicians? The Premier is ' making a ver^ imporcant point by refetri:丄ny tne matter to the court. In all probability the court will conclude that
i立的敎育制度》故此應該與公立 學校一樣得到同等的待遇^也就
是全面津貼。這項憲法上的權利"
高院會指出比安省的歷史還要悠久
。在安省還暴被稱爲西加拿大的時 候》該項權利早已存在。也可以說 r沒有這項憲法上的保證"安省也
不會参加加拿大聯邦◎
還有》在安省的天主敎會得到獨
立敎育制度保障的同時P魁北克省 (當時稱爲東加拿大)的基督敎會 亦得到同樣的保證。當時fe北克省 的公立學校也'就拿如該省的天主敎 敎會學梭*而該省的基督徒一如
the province's Catholics have a constitutioridl right to a seperdte education system, which therefoce should- be 、 funded the same.way as the public (noadenominacioaal) system. 、 This constitutional right; the court could correcL correctly add, is older thaa Ont^cio "iLseli! 工匚was e'scab丄ished in the pre-Coafe-deration era of oar history, when Ontw丄u as we know ic was 'ca丄丄Caaada- West. Arguably, Confederdtipri might not have taken place had Catholics not been given a constitutions丄 guarantee to a seperate school system.
Moreover f it should be kept in mind that at the time the .Catholics of Ontario (Canada West) were given, no more special consideration than the Protestants of Quebec (then called Canada East )。 Quebec's Protestants w^re given the right to their' v^Lbioa of a 58seperace" school system, i.e. they were provided with an alternative to the Catholic school system which effective丄y made up the "public6 school system of
DESMOND GL麵
'省的天主徒般得到特別的待遇,他
們有權各自成立自己約學校制度o
到如今魁省的基督敎學校仍是獲线 府全面資助的。當前任安省省長囊
維斯聲稱,他想修正一項歷史上i: 不平等事件的痔候/他的意思是麵「
望本省的天主敎會一如魁省的基餐 徒一樣&囘復一項憲^上所保障i
權利。
省6彼德遜表示他p戴維斯一翁 具備政治家的尊嚴和勇氣。當法騰 宣佈全面資助天主敎學校在憲法, 是受到保障的時候。省長便可以食: 正言順地惟行這項政策。
that province, The Protestant;: schools of Quebec are fully funded. When former Premier: William Davis said he wanted應: lo correct an histori|c injustice by extending ii'ill fariaing .;:
the province'^ Catnolxcs ne inearLt lie was qiwiaq them what Quebec ' Protest.ants have a丄ways had.
Mr. Petersori_Jaa-s--shown he : has as muclT^nt^grity aiid political courage as Mr. Davi.s ;':: on this issue. Once the court-has made its pronouncement on;"
the validity of full funding,: Premier Peterson will be able to argue that far from evading:; his politics丄duty he is carrying oat his responsibility to the fullest. He will be able to argue that to ignore the historic injustice his predecessor wanted to ameliorate ; would be 、ari evasion of respcm:, sibi丄ity. The opposition wilt; have a hard time arguing that it is not the duty of our political leadership to make ^ sure that constitutional guarantees should not be protected to the fullest extent.
出版:信達傳播機掉 published by: SYNAPSIS COMMUNICATiOiS SNC. 地址:291 OUNDAS ST. WEST SUITE328 TORONTO M5T mi TEL: 597- 1648 597- !673
慶大打字行59 5—1272
CHIN TAI CHINESE TYPESETTING CO.
01 ANA T. YEH 姚翠華
總編輯:羅鏘鳴 業務鄯經璦:林維裹
EDITOR-IN- CHIEF: FQSTiR C.齲.LB BUSINESS MANAGER: JAM£S IL謹
編輯助璦:馮齄儀 業務顧問:徐潤泉
SOiTORIAL ASSISTANT: LAURA FUNG BUSINESS CONSULTANT: CHUI YUM. CHUEN
廣吿部經理:伍啓照
ADVERTISING MANAGER: ARTHUR m
廣吿部副經理:黃志揚
ASSISTANT ADVERTISING MANAGER: HENRY mm
製作/美術經璦:雷德甲 ART/PRODUCTION MANAGER: PETER LUG 製作/美術助理:李得禧 ART/PRODUCTION ASSISTANT: KENT LI
厶
1
• 7/L
v
Turn
厂
z
几
丄
-一.s^".
、:V. --.
.一-..
一 J
一貧
.-.,. 一..
J