OHLYIHAmiCA
By HARRY GOLDEN
REPORT FROM CAPETOWN
the Canadian Jewish News, Fri(Iay Sept. 29, 1961 — 5
By Dr. LOUIS RABINOWITZ
A BREATHING STRUCTURE » OUR SCHOOLS
When Carl Sandburg spoke at one of the high schools named after him, he told the students that it was a "breathing structure newly brought to life." I think Carl m»ght have added it was a breathing structure that never dies, not because it is named -after him, but because It Is school. A new school is one thing, an old school no different. It is just that as the schools open again to absorb the mlUions ot American children, we forget how raluable an institution they are. If anything is preserved out of a culture, it Is always preserved through the schools. We simply take schools for granted and our great blessings as Americans is that we have been able to do this.
Centuries ago. the Emperor Nero sent his, most able general, Vespasian, to put dovra a rebellion in Judea. With an army of 50,000 legionnaires, Vespasian subdued Galilee and laid siege to Jerusalem in 68 AD.
The Hebrew scholar Johanan, counseled surrender, hoping thereby to avoid the destruction ■ of the temple. But the Jews decided to fight. Thus a few years later, Vespasian's son Titus destroyed Jerusalem and laid waste to the temple.
Johanan went to the tent of the conqueror and asked for permission to estabhsh a school where
he and a few other scholars could gather to discuss the ancient Hebrew writings. He asked if he could establish this lltUe school in the town of Jabneh.
Vespasian granted the request. The Romans had been bent upon destruction of the rebellious Jews and had succeeded. The temple lay In rtdns. the ground was plowed imder with salt, the defenders^ decimated. If the Jews wanted to set up a little academy where a few old men could chant prayers and read sacred books It seemed a request innocent enough. Certainly it wotild present no problems for the great Roman Empire.
But in the end, it was this academy, this school that kept alive the Jewish people, that maintained a continuity between their traditions and their history. The little academy outli\"ed Vespasian and indeed the entire Roman Empire.
The Romans live today only by virtue of the historian while the descendants of Johanan are building academies ail over Israel.
As school opens in this weary world of crisis, we may salvage the hope that though we are forced to fight for democracy and tighten our belts for it, we have done much to insure its perpetuation in the thousands upon thousands of free public schools that proliferate through the land.
THE RATS WOULD   TAKE OVER
The public school scandal in New York, which has come along to add fuel to the fire of a mayoralty campaign, began with a rat who scampqred in front of the inspectors, including Mayor Wagner, investigating one of the school buildings.
In the tenements of Spanish Harlem, the wo^ men have often stood guard over their children during the night to fight off the tenement rats. It should no longer come, as a surprise to any of us that the rats which infest tenements are brave and bold enough to attack babies .
The tenement mothers sometimes employ a decoy system to insure their babies' rest. They leave food in the kitchen and leave the kitchen to the rats. This is a system apparently the rats understand. If there is sufficient food, the rats rarely bother the rest of the rooms.
For over 2,000 years humans have been waging a struggle against rats. The struggle has been "a Mexican standoff." Neither side wins nor loses. Certainly the rat population equals that of humans all over the world despite the invention of poisons, rat traps and other implements of this war.
It may be true that the rats are from another planet and have not yet found a way to express
(Copyright by The Conadion Jewish
themselves about It, but If anyone succeeds man as master of earth it will be the rat, which has a better sense of CMnmunity than man ever had.
Rats were recognized as a major problem of Western man in 163 AD. Borne had reached its zenith under Marcus Aurelius but after nearly 50 years of peace a revolt broke out against Rome in Parthia (Iran) and in Syria. Marcus Aurelius sent his best general, Avidius Cassius, to put down the enemy. Though Roman legionnaires overcame both rebellions, in their triumph they brought back to Rome a larger, more insidious, and more detennined enemy — the black death, which is spread hy the rat. For the next 20 years the bubonic plague ravaged the Roman world. The rat struck the first terrible blow in the decline of the Roman Empire.
If we should ever loose the hydrogen bomb against an enemy and the enemy release one against us, the victory of the rat would be almost assured. Rats are adept at changing their en\'ironment and can live deep imdergroimd thus escaping the problems of radiation.
There is no such thing as a deserted city. Ever>' ruin in the world is populated by thousands of rats.
News & Harry Golden)
On March 21, I returned to South Africa after five months' leave abroad. It was immediately after the news that Dr. Ver-woerd, the Prime Minister of South Africa, had withdrawn his application for continued Commonwealth membership after South Africa's becoming a Republic on May 31. I landed at Jan Smuts Airport, unaware that only a few hours before Dr. Verwoerd had landed there on his return from London, and had been accorded an "Tiyst«rical "hero's welcome" by jubilant Nationalists.
Nevertheless I Immediately sensed an air of suppressed excitement and emotional ten-sion, which was almost tangible ahd palpable iand which affected me ahnost physically. Whatever its reason was, I was determined not to succumb to it, and when a reporter asked me my views on South Africa'* imminent withdrawal from the Commonwealth I contented myself with saying that the decision had come as a great shock to me, the present situation could not continue, and that some coI^ cessions would have to be made to the Native population.
The effect of that simple, and, to my mind, imobjectionable statement upon the Jewish com-mimity was astonishing. A spate of letters appeared in the daily Press frran Jewish indinduals dissociating themselves from my statement. One of them emphasized that I did not speak in the name of the Jewish community, another deplored the fact that the rabbi had l)ecome a "politic-
al' predikaht", while the third contributed an epistle" to the Afrikaans Nationalist newpaper, in which he said that "when the Chief Rabbi preaches or speaks or lectures on religious matters he is accorded every respect, but when he speaks on political matters he must realise that he is only "an ordinary temporary resident of th^ country whose views can accordingly be rejected".
WHAT IS WHITE CIVILIZATION
A few weeks later there appeared iji one of the Sunday papers a letter from one of my young ministers. It was headed "What is White CiviUsaWon?" and read as follows:
"The majority of Eurqpeans in this country seem united in their ideali.stlc desire to preserve what is often termed "White CivilisatJon". Could one of your White readers inform me, what is White Civilisation?
"To the best of my humble knowledge civilisation originated in parts of the world which are anything but white. I refer to Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, the area of the Middle East known as the Fertile Crescent, and, of course. China. It was only after many years that this civilisation spread through Roman-Greek m-fluence to Europe.
'May I humbly suggest to your readers that, for the future happiness and security of this country, we all work for "civilisation",, without the 'White' in front of it?"
The effect of that letter was
m
even more drastic. A person of some prominence In th^ community not only took him severely to task in a long epistle for this unwarranted intrusion into "politics" but actually sent a copy of his private communication to the Committee of the congregation which he serves, and to the over-all religious administrate Ive organisation. (It is only fair to add that he subsequently den-led his purpose in so doing was to bring pressure from a lay body upon a minister to restrict his freedom of speech, and apologised for his action).
PRESSURE UPON WHITES
The virtual imanimity of the nations of the world in condemning the racial policy of the Union, as exemplified, for instance, by the unparalleled vote of 93 to one In the General Assembly of the United Nations against South Africa, has brought in its train a definite change on the part of the White population, even those who are ideologically and politically opposed to the policies of the Government. As a thoughtful political writer puts it:
"The pressure is on all Whites to conform in defence of their Interests as a White people,' to offer utter obedience to the White cause, and to sacrifice individual freedom of thought and action. It is In this constricted atmosphere that the new concepts of loyalty, patriotism, and now treason are arising... And so the subtle pressure of confor-mism work steadily among the Wliites, kraaling them off, gang-
RAi
D
ing them together".
The result of that tendency, about which there can be no doubt, is that liberal attitudes and reasoned criticism of an existing state of affairs, which were previously conceded as belonging to the legitimate and the justified, are now, in this changed climate, regarded as subversive and even as bordering ori the treasonable.
If this is true of the White commimity as a whole, it bears down even more heavily upon the Jewish community. Although there is a little, if any, tangible evidence to support such a view, the view is nevetheless widespread that the Jewish conuntm-ity is in a position of special vulnerability, ...that a deterioration of the political or economic situation will readily produce a scapegoat in the Jew, that anti-semltlsm which has happily been practically non-existent since the present (Sovemment came into power — despite Its doubtful record during the World War and while it was in opposition — has not been so much eradicated as suppressed, and that It can rear its ugly head at the slightest provocation.
POLITICS & RELIGION
The Jew, therefore, who pre-simies to express a view not in conformity with the policy of the Government tends to be regarded as a near double traitor. He is regarded as being guilty of a dis-service to the Jewish community as such by bringing its loyalty to the existing regime
into question and laying it open to aittacks; and he is regarded as aiding in fermenting sedition and subversive activities against the intereists of the White population and their self-preservation.
In an atmosphere such as this the position of the rabbi becomes one of peculiar difficulty, which Is well-nigh Intolerable. No matter how rigidly he confines himself to the purely ethical and religious implications of the prevalent racial policy, the moment he utters a word which can be construed as a criticism of that policy he is immediately charged with "preaching politics". It is impossible to exaggerate the lengths to which such acri"-''*^"ns go.
The official policy, of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, which is that the Je\\ish conunmiity as such cannot express any view on the political situation, since Jews belong to all parties, generously concedes the right of the rabbi to .speak on its ethical aspects. In effect, however, this widely interpreted not only that he should confine himself to pulpit utterances but that such pulpit utterances should not receive any publicity outside the pulpit. When, there for, as often happens, the daily Press finds a sermon on the political situation Of sufficient general interest to warrant publication, there is a vague feeling that the rabbi has gone too far. In other words, the "concession" is limited by the consideration that the rabbi may speak - prov-
(Continued on page 7)
From Bandung To Belgrade
U Nu' Stand Against Arabs a Triumph for lustice
By DAVID HACOHEN
There was % feeling that justice had triumphed at last when it became known in Israel that the concerted Arab attempt to turn the Belgrade conference into yet another anti-Israel meeting had been foiled, mainly by the detennined efforts' of U Nu and Mr. Nehru.
A Parallel is being drawii vrith Bandung in 1955, and the questions asked why the Arabs were successful then if they have failed iiow, under seemingly more •lasplclous circumstances.
The answer lies in the circumstances of the Bandung conference, in the organization of the Arabs and the absence of an opposition and, to no savaXX degree, in Israel's handling of its relations with the Afro-Asian countries then and now.
When the five sponsors of the Bandung amf erence — the Prime Minister of India, Burma, Pakistan, Ceylon and Indonesia — held their preliminary meetings in Colombo and Bogor to discuss the agenda for Bandimg, it was already clear that the AralK were pressing hard for Israel's exclusion. In fact, they informed the Colombo meeting through the intermediary of the two Moslem Prime Ministers attendmg it that they would attend no conference at which Israel was present.
At first U Nu and Nehru stood their ground, arguing that as a sovereign Asian state Israel could not be prevented from attending; but In their anxiety to get the Bandimg conference . laimched and in their fear that it might disintegrate if the 13 Moslem states . invited refused to part' icipate, ultimately they gave in. "in Burma, Israel's exclusion set off a voluble waye of protest, notably by the press. The biggest. Rangoon newspaper, the: independent "Na.tion"--stormed editorially against what it called the flouting of principle; the semi-offldai "Times of Burma" ex< pressed Its disappointment at the CJoloniibo nations'' giving in to the 'extortion'^ of the M^em ■, ftates.- /
ARAB PRESSURE
U Nu and Messrs. Nehru and Krishna Menon told the writer at the time that they' had been unable to withstand Arab pres--sure aS far as Israel's presence was coricemed, but that under no cdrcmnstances would they permit the Israel-Arab conflict to be brought up at Banduiig. ITio Indian and Burman leaders ■were tol<i that we feared such a^. assessment of the situation was somewhat • ovier-optiinistic
For never before — and never Blnce — has a great international confererice~been held in circumstances so favourable to the Arabs/as Bandung. "They were'represented by their top leaders: Premier Abdul Nasser, Prime
Ministers Jamali of Iraq, Sami es-Solt of Lebaiton, and the Emir Faisal of Saudia, and Foreign Minister Khaled al Azm of Syria. Each of these *'as seconded by his foreign minister and other top officials, schooled in diplomacy and experienced at international corrferences, clever and aggressive men like Ahmad Shukairy, Muhammad Fawzy and Dr. CJharles Malik, and ac': compained by scores of newspapermen. To top it off, the ex-Muftl of Jerusalem and Arab League Secretary Hassouna were there.
The other Asian reprraentat-ives, quiet, poUte, tolerant and often self-effaciiig, were lost amidst this onslaught. And an onslaught it was, for the Arabs belonging to different world camps and often thoioughly divided among themselves, not only presented a ixnited front when it came to Israel but carried, out their pressure for anti-Israel resolutions as a plaxmed and combined operation.
Each Arab del^atlon exerted pressure on that section of the Bandimg conference to which it was closest;, the Thais, Filipiiios and Turks that were indentified with Western polisy, the Indians and Burmans that sought neut-; ralism, the Conunimlst Chinese. In eac;h of these groupings the Arabs demanded their potmd of Israel flesh. In this pre-poiscmed athosphere a series of venomous and slanderous harangues were then delivered, drowning common sense and toleration in an ocean of rhetoric and misrepresentation. This play on the guided sympathies and frequent lack of accurate information among the listeners was accompanied, where heeded, by threats arid bluster: "We know thai Israel has friends in this hall", shouted Charles"'~MaIik of Lebar non at the plenary, shaking his finger at U Nu. "Let them not believe for one moment that the Arab world will give tn to_theml"
BURMANS iSOLAlTED
And the Buimans found thirari-selves lonely Bind isolated, among the representatives of thirty nations.There was no non-Moslem nation to back them up. Romulo of the Philippines and Prince Wan of Thailand, who bad had experience with Arab tactici at the U.N. and now headad delegations that exerted a good deal of weight; at the conference, contented themselves with nodding and sighing when the Burmans approached them. Authoritative observers have eipressed the opinion that the U.S., pvilltng strings behind the scenes, wajs actively interested that the'con-^ forence occupy itself with aiiti-Israel resolutions rather. Uiain problems whl6h Wa^iington was not Interested in having brought up. Turkey's Zoriu was actively
hostile to Israd: and as for Chou En-Lal, coming to a conference at which only naif a dozen of the na,tions represented recognized Peking, he immediately sensed the potMitialities of the Arab block. There was only Nehru, and he, iforoed to counter the influence of his rival Prime Minister Mohammed All of Pakistan, beat a hasty retreat after a few half-hearted ^attempts.
Back in Rangoon, the Burmans, embittered, complained that it was partly Israel's own fault for not mobilizing her friends. But with the exception of Japan, whose participation at Bandung was her first international appearance stnce the war and whose delegates tried to make themselves as inconspidous as possible, Burma was the only coimtrj' represented at the conference where we had accredited representatives. For all her relations vrtth the Afro-Asian states in those days, Israel had to rely on her contacts at the U.N. — out of touch with Afro-Asian statesmeii and public opinion on its home groimd. This was' undeniably a major reason for the fiasco at Bandimg.
STOOD GROUND
Notwithstanding all these liand-Icaps, U Nu and iiis men stood their ground for several days against any resolution denourtc-Ing or defaming Israel. When, in the end, Nehru, too, abandoned them they had to give in, although the resolution that was ultimately passed was far less exlieme in its language than what the Arabs had proposed, being mainly sodaj rather than political in character;
The Rangoon press was lip In arms again, '''The Nation" and other newspapers not hesitating to criticise the government sharply for giving in to the anti-ls-ra^ pressure. It was a pointed illustration of the effect the close working relations that had been established between the two countries had had pn puWic op^ Inloh, Without these relations, Israel would hive remained just another name to the Burmans, and it would have occured to no one to defend her against Arab denuncdatiori. or political attacks. It was a lesson that had to be learned.
But there was also IT Nu. Without him there would haye been, no stand against Arab plots at Bandung. Upright, striving with all h|s might to be.fair and just, to thiiik right, h« proved the very personification of the Buddhist ethics for which he stands. And at Belgrade, Israel's increased prestige and her nunlfied Mt of political contracts and gooA relations. -With:_the Afrth Asian world helped him stand ih the breach ai>d group .around him others equally desirous that ixo Injustice bo done.     /, .■
'{■ .  \'   ;   / ■ ■ ■ ■
lionists and Education
By Dr. JOSEPH DIAMOND
President, National Council  for Jewish Education
The forthcoming Convention of the Central Division of the Zionist Organization of Canada to be held in Windsor, Ontario, October 7-8, 1961 will surely come out with another flowery resolution in support of Jewish education. Similar resolutions vieing with one another in earnestness and In style have come from all other Zionist assemblies all over the free Jewish world; all of them professing strong Zionist commitments to Jewish education as a sine qua non to creative Jewish living and to the very essence of Zionism itself. There is no dearth of resolutions and declarations proclaiming Zionist concern for Jewish education. But this is as far as it goes. When it comes to translating these resolutions into budgetary terms in behalf of Jewish education on the community level, the local Zionists are In most cases blamed for whatever curtailment or limitation the Federation or Welfare Fund is forced to impose upon its Jewish education program for lack of sufficient funds. It Is an antmialous and uncomfortable position in which.the local Zionist organization finds itself as a partner with Federation In the United Jewish Appeal. "The Federation partner calls for more money to meet the growing needs of Jewish education in the community; and the Zionist partner is imjieldlng because of the growing needs lii Israel.
We understand the difficult position In which both partners find the^elves. In most communities this division of interest as between local and Israel needs Is more Imaginary than real. "Federation people" are not less concerned with" the needs in Israel, nor more with Jewish education than are the Zionists. Between them they should be able to find a mode of operation which will avoid stress, preserve unity wthin the community and allow Jewish education to function adequately. They cannot, however, find that modus operandi locally. National leadership in the Zionist organization must show the way by resolution at this Conference to translate statements of national endorsement into a mode of local application which would be binding upon Zionists In every community.
Zionist have long a%o recognized that on the list of local needs in the community Jewish Education ranks first. They must press for similar recognition of priority status for Jewish Education on the part of the locar Federation within whose present structure they, the Zionists, occupy no secondary positlori. They should be able to point out convincingly that among all other Jewish local needs there are very few, if any, which must rely upon local Jewish funds exclusively for their budgetary needs as does the local Jewish education program. Its budget must therefore be adequate and guaranteed on a priority basis by agreenient between both partners of UJA.        ■■—   ^ -
A resoliitlon to this effect, if it were to come from the forthcoming Conference of the ZOC, would go a long way in securing the position of Jewish education, to which purpose Zionists are deeply committed.
Kibbush Hak-hlloth —- "Conquest of the conununlty" — as a fundamental Zionist precept, will ultimately be achieved by what. is done for; not by what is said about Jewish Education. ,
A TRUE FRIEND OF ISRAEL U NU OF BURMA
HUMAN RELATIONSi
Possessive Mother
QUESTION: A situation took place In my family very recently which I con't understand or get to the reason for. Could you odvise me in thij motter, and also tell me if the attitude I am taking is correct.-*
We have on only child, o son who is 25. He met a young lady four months ago, has already proposed marriage, and was accepted by her and her parents, in spite of the fact that neither the. young Iqdy nor her parents had met my husband, me or qny other member of my family — although they reside o very short dist-once from our home.
My son suggested thot I invite the young lady to our house for dinner^ which I refused, because I am o fthe opinion that her parents should ot least hove called us or invited us to their home to discuss the matter.
ANSWER: The reason for the situation which hos taken place in your family appeors to be a good and healthy one. Your son, at 25, felt liberated and independent enough to make his own choice and decision atxiut the most important relationship in his life.
Somehow, this act of self-liberation, which should moke you happy ond proud, appears os the ultimate in rebeliousness. You regard it in some ways oS the typicol misbehavior of an adolescent. Perhaps this is because he was on only child who wos the center and concern of your whole life.
You may still look upon him emotionally as your little boy. .When he foils to check with you and consult you about everything you consider important in his life, then he is a bad and disrespectful little boy who has to be called to task and fHjnished. -
Four months is quite enough time for a man to get to know and love o woman .whom he desires in marriage. The some is true of the girl. It makes for happier family living when the. two sets of in-laws like each other and get along in a friendly fashion. But neither set of parents has to undergo any screening of tests. In order that the young couple may foil in love and go on to marry.
What you may be objecting to Is that your son did not extend to you the some courtesy of meeting the girl and hoving the opportunity to
DR. ROSE N. FRANZBLAU
like her which the girl extended to him In relation to her parents and family. In this sense you pre justified in feeling thot he behoved poorly.
However, your son may have hesitoted to fell you about his decision while it was pending because he feared thot you would intrude ond interfere. He was perhaps apprehensive that you might creote problems and try to postpone the decision or even break up the relationship altogether.
By presenting you with o fait accompli which was alreody known to other people, your son perhaps thought to protect himself. Any disruptive act on your part would then hove to be out in the open and could be criticized by oil.
Just as the girl's parents invited your son to their home ond welcomed ond occepted him, so should you comply with your son's request and have his fiance over for dinner and an evening at your home. You should not permit your annoyance with him to stand In the way of liking and accepting her. Once you have met the girl, your son loves, then the two sets of parents can get together.
Neither the girl nor her parents should ha
blamed for what your son did. Their action may well hove been directed by his wishes. If he thought that you would wont to discuss the matter with the other set of parents os if it were a business deal, then his behavior would be quite understandable.
This young man of 25 must be treated with the respect due his age and maturity. You will not bring him any closer to you or moke your future relationship any smoother by creating dissension and disogreement at this very happy time in his life.
If your relationship is basically o good one, it will withstand buffeting. But if you act up and behave like rejected ones who must now be \vooed, you will be treated occordingly by the young couple. The young people ore to . busy wooing each other to woo their parents. ,
When you give up your son lovingly and graciously to the woman of his choice, as a mor ther should, your son wilt return to you. The relationship will be different but for better than the one you had with him before.
- at -
QUESTION: My son, 9, "is bright and outgoing to the extent of getting up in class to recite or ringing doorbells' for raffles,. etCv He .enjoys having boys over, but will not go to any. of their homes. He also belongs to. the. Cub Scouts.
When there Is an . outing of any sort he loves to attend, providing his dad. of mother go along. When the boys coll him up to go anywhere,, like o movie or a boll gome, he refuses. He preferes to-ploy alone with-his chemistry set, and is always: reading ostronomy books, etc.
\He: has o S'/a-yeor-old brother who constantly teases hirn, and due to the, difference in ages I do not allow him to strike' back. This makes him unhappy. It was with great effort that I got him to join the Cub-^Scouts. .
He seems to be o very sensitive child and is very attached to me. His whole world seems to crumble if I scold him for anything, or if I get ongry at KIrti. He just can't take that. How con we get him.to leave me for a little while and go out with the boys when they call him?
ANSWER; To be secure within himself ond with others when he Is away from home, a child must carry with him a strong and loving image of the porent figure. When the Image Is a punishing one, ,then the child refuses to go anywhere without the actual parent. He feels he mu:t stay home, to protect his territory, which Is cbnstoptly' being threatened, even when he is thiere.
Sibling rivalry is not overcome when the rhother ii overprotective of one child ogoinst the. other. Parents only add fuel to the normaj fires of\ag-gressiveness by dividing the children ogoinst eoc|> other. It is the parents' way of staying in control and of .keeping each child close to and dependent on her. ' ' , .
By trcoting th« children os equals, you lower 1 ■ ■ (Copyright bv
the status of the older boy ond up the status of the'younger one. Your older boy's security connot grow, when his parents permit him-to be ottacked and then forbid him to defend himself.' Seeing how unprotected he is in his own home, he naturally fears even worse exjjeriences away from home. '
.• Your older boy seems to be b very bright youngster, with varied interests and with . real liking for people, who op.erotes on. a_ rather.superior level for o youngster his oge. Having mOrty friends who. conrie to see him shows thot he has good social, contacts. It Is certainly commendable' for a youngster of 9 to wont to work with his chemistry jet and to learn more obout astronomy. This should be •'^encouraged . instead of' frowned u^n as if it were some. misdemeanor,
- At various stages in children's lives, they need
the backing .bf parentis more than at other times!—, A youngster like your older boy, who is storting out oruhis search for hinriself, . wonts and needs . bocking from his: parents ogoinst the assaults of other children in the family. . To. excuse your .second boy's behavior on the basis that he, is young and doesn't know what he
- is doing soys to "your older boy that to get his parents' protection, he. must behove like o. child.
To begin with, you ought to lessen the tension and the fights between the two children by reprl-
■ mohding your younger boy when he misbehaves and by laying down and enforcing firm rules obout his, behavior toward-.his older brother. -.When you dislaipllne the younger one, your older
""boy will nbtfeelso frustrated and unfairly treated. When your older boy thinks you are being fair in your treatment of both of them, he will come to the defense of his. little brother when necessary. When this happens, you will know thot - your older boys' feel protected ond-loved enough to wont
. to protect and (pve his-'brothel'.. He will then be ready, without being/told, to leave home and go.^ out into the World/which he will fee] will bc^as loving and foir a^his home has come to be. aN* N.Y. Post)
■ • ^ '1